Editors: what to do when you are accused of using AI
An author or publisher believes editing was done by a tool rather than a person.
- What is at stake
- Trust with authors, which is the whole of an editor's business.
- Your evidence position
- Tracked changes carry author names and timestamps, and editorial correspondence shows judgement being applied.
- Do this first
- Send the tracked-changes file. It shows what was changed, by whom, and when, at a level of detail no tool produces.
- The trap
- Legitimate AI use inside an editor's workflow being conflated with not doing the work. Disclose tool use plainly and describe what you contributed.
Related pages that will help
Editor disputes usually turn on the same few things: what a detector actually claims about its own accuracy, which pieces of evidence survive scrutiny, and whether a contract put the risk on you. The pages below cover each.
More in who is accusing you
Other signposts