Home / By situation / Editors

Editors: what to do when you are accused of using AI

An author or publisher believes editing was done by a tool rather than a person.

What is at stake
Trust with authors, which is the whole of an editor's business.
Your evidence position
Tracked changes carry author names and timestamps, and editorial correspondence shows judgement being applied.
Do this first
Send the tracked-changes file. It shows what was changed, by whom, and when, at a level of detail no tool produces.
The trap
Legitimate AI use inside an editor's workflow being conflated with not doing the work. Disclose tool use plainly and describe what you contributed.

See what evidence your own document carries

Upload a .docx and Inkprint reads the process record inside it. Free, unlimited, no account.

Analyze a document Read the full guide

Related pages that will help

Editor disputes usually turn on the same few things: what a detector actually claims about its own accuracy, which pieces of evidence survive scrutiny, and whether a contract put the risk on you. The pages below cover each.

More in who is accusing you

Other signposts